Thursday, January 28, 2010

Compulsive Moving Things Who Agrees That This Potential 'compulsive Sex Education From Age 5' Is A Really Good Thing?

Who agrees that this potential 'compulsive sex education from age 5' is a really good thing? - compulsive moving things

5 years to learn the correct names for body parts, relationships, and are in same-sex relationships on pregnancy, contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, etc., as they progress in school.

11 comments:

SarahLou said...

I think it's a good thing. There will also be open, and sex is taboo. I've always said if I had kids, I'll be able to feel comfortable to teach sex education at an early age, just because I never sex education or the school until my parents that I go to college and that made me ashamed to talk about things . I did not even my mother when I began my time because I thought it would be a bad thing to say! Besides, said one of my friends in the crib me that people use condoms to prevent their children have asthma, and I thought I would be up to 10!

As you said, will not start learning about pregnancy, contraception, sexually transmitted diseases until they understand a little larger and easier to use. Children begin to talk about these things when they are young, as seen in my experience, and I think it would be better to know the truth about contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, etc., instead of believing what was your friends!

louie said...

I remember starting in Kindergarten Teacher Training "class." It was good to teach body parts, names, and also that the parties privately to you. Help at hand with a few things: educating children about sexual abuse without more detail. Some parents do not teach children that this material because it did not want to and do for schools, I think it's great.
2 years ago my daughter was in kindergarten, and inform them of this yet .. I feel younger, better and 5 is a good time to start from the beginning of the process of sex education.

only know of each, to teach sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy to parenthood, teaching the body and privacy.

floppity said...

No, the reason we have a high pregnancy rate has nothing to do with sex education, we must ask ourselves why are these children so young who want sex. If we are to help ensure that children will feel safe, and if the parents let their children know they are loved, it does not look elsewhere. Many girls were actually pregnant on purpose just to feel loved and wanted for nothing.

This government is so shit at all. Decide it is something that parents, if I wanted my child for five years, the intricacies of sex, then teach them to learn to be - we ask the state to replace the mother and take her simply wrong.

(PS, I live on a farm, so that my children know when piglets and lambs before they even speak. I do not want disturbed, what some teachers say that they receive.)

Heather J said...

The keyword is "gradual".

There is nothing wrong with a 5-year, who knows, a "Willy" is a penis and "Everything is a vagina.

Y6 taught and most of the teaching of "sex" was the change in the body and puberty and personal hygiene. The reproduction is taught, but are "connected as part of the" Circle of Life, with all living beings.

How can this be evaluated as good or bad is to see what is taught when. I can not imagine, ETS in the first curriculum?

True Brit said...

I am not opposed to education, if five, but really, after the video when it ten and eleven, I had my foot.
When you see the videos during the scenes where the woman gives birth, the camera is almost between his knees. I do not think it's appropriate, and I still do not understand, so to have children to cope with this scene. Grown men weak, why children should deal with him? My knees hurt from how they hold!
And ten years you need to experience orgasm (not one but two )????
I think education is all very well, and in fact all my children have learned about babies and where they come from, when they began to ask questions. I have no problem with it, but I'm having problems with education, graphics, etc. extensively.
Girls do not want to start my fear of childbirth. And no, I think it is a good contraceptive. Contrapception is good when you take control, not because you are afraid of birth.

Pippin said...

Complus sex education? Not sure what you mean. Can you say * required *? (As if you need it.)

Yes, sex education is a good thing. The course content is age appropriate fundamentals of kindergarten to more complex ideas in high school. Why not learn well for children and adolescents about their bodies, pregnancy, contraception, STDs, etc.?

Ostrich policy is not. But given the dozens of questions daily newspaper published at Y! Only rudimentary of issues ( "fired. Can I pregnant?" I had sex with my time. Why can not I pregnant? "Should I take the pill once a day or only when I have sex?") Is obvious, that ignorance is widespread, and anything we can do to change that, can only be a good thing.

EMILY II said...

Why the hell does a 5YR old knowledge about sex and relationships? Sex education does not determine whether a person is a teen mother or not. The kind of girls who are pregnant often themselves (notice I said usually) people who p * Teens will be a Friday evening and spend time in the children instead of school. Sex education as a whole is something that is to blame for the fact that they have a baby because she is not with the fact that some have everything their fault. Teaching an old 5YR What is a penis and a vagina will not stop children when they are in school.

There is so much better than the taxpayers' money could be spent, and the government will be devoted to sex education classes 5YR old. How pathetic.

Mommy of 2 awesome babies said...

Now that I answered a question similar to today ...

I teach my children when they are old enough to understand about sexual enlightenment. Little by little.

And I agree, I am sure he will not be descriptive, but the awareness of sex in the age of 5 years and older, and little by little, I think it's a good thing.

Take a look at teenagers today? They are now starting in sex education classes, eh? Class 6 or 7? Do you believe that your work? As with all early sex and pregnancies among teenage girls today, I would say do not work, no. Then they have to do something.

Teresa76 said...

I agree with her at this age. In fact, I agree with him be taught at any age in school should be for the parents, through their kind of things to talk. You know, when the time comes. If I learn that the school is to make my children sex education at this age in the school to give them the peace of my soul. Even if you teach a 5 years, as you know that the child was sexually abused at home ...... think that he rule in the. Am I wrong or write

Teri ann Rainbow said...

I read your question and all agreed that five of the young to be teaching sex education at all. Children and adults are unique individuals and as a baby and should as such, I agree with Hannah, why all the thumbs-down treatment for your reply? because it is only for my part, I think it is safe!

Stu said...

Sorry, but 5 is too young to know everything about sex, especially gay stuff!
When the kids reach over 8, I think it's almost the age of reason!
I have a 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., which does not need to know about sex but also
My 18 years with no babies left to right and center!
I tell my 7-year-old on gay sex as unnatural anyway!

Post a Comment